The extent to which judges should be involved in fundraising for civic and charitable causes is an important issue of judicial ethics. The default rule adopted by judicial councils in Canada precludes judges from fundraising subject to only minor exceptions. Yet anecdotal evidence indicates that Canadian judges fundraise in breach of this rule. This raises the question of whether there should be a change to the rule so as to allow judges greater scope for fundraising activities. The aim of this paper is to review the ethical rules for judicial fundraising and evaluate whether they require modifications for the modern Canadian judiciary. As comparative law the paper will look at the law in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia.
Judicial Fundraising in Canada
Teacher(s)'/ Author(s)' contact information
Faculty of Law, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
Select the option that describes the rights you hold in the attached content
I do not hold complete rights to all intellectual property in the attached content, but have permission from all people or entities who do hold rights in the attached content to post it on the Forum website and to grant the license, if any, that I have chosen below.
Select a license for the attached content
"Download Only": I give permission for other users to download the attached content, as long as they do not copy, distribute, repost it on the web, or alter the work in any way. (post-only permission)