Register for free to upload content and post comments

A user-driven online community and resource library for ethics teachers, scholars, and practitioners worldwide.

Ontario's New Law Society Tribunal

Submitted by David Wright on Fri, 08-29-2014
Long title
An Independent Tribunal Within a Self-Governing Law Society: Ontario's New Law Society Tribunal
Wright, David A.
Author(s)' contact information
David Wright
Law Society Tribunal
130 Queen St W
Toronto, ON M5H 2N6 CANADA
Conference title
International Legal Ethics Conference
Conference location
London, UK
Select the option that describes the rights you hold in the attached content
I hold complete rights to all intellectual property in the attached content and have the power to grant the license, if any, that I have chosen below.
Select a license for the attached content
"Copy": I give permission for other users to download the attached content and copy, distribute, and repost it on the web, as long as they credit the author(s) and the publication and provide relevant identifying citation information (volume, page numbers, year of publication, city of publication), do not change the work in any way, and do not use it commercially. ("Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives" Creative Commons license)
In 2013, at the request of the Law Society of Upper Canada, the Legislature of Ontario, Canada passed the Modernizing Regulation of the Legal Profession Act which establishes the Law Society Tribunal. This marks a significant change in the approach to hearing and deciding discipline, licensing and other regulatory matters involving lawyers and paralegals. Previously, benchers (governors) directed all aspects of the quasi-judicial hearing process and most adjudicators were benchers.
The approach to reform is based on the model of other administrative tribunals in Ontario, with some modifications in light of self-governance. The Law Society Tribunal is led by a non-bencher Chair and elected bencher Vice-Chairs appointed by the governors. Adjudicators include elected benchers and other lawyer, paralegal and lay members with adjudicative experience. The implementation of the model includes initiatives such as performance evaluation of adjudicators (including benchers), approaches to promoting consistency and increased professional development that have formed a key part of enhancing administrative justice in other boards and tribunals.
The presentation discusses the new model, the reasons for it, and its challenges. I will comment on the work done during the first months of the new Tribunal and the next steps in enhancing the quality, fairness and independence of quasi-judicial decision-making about regulation of lawyers and paralegals in Ontario.
Teaching Topics
Other Topics
Lawyer Regulation